But analysts like Gottheil downplayed the talk. Some observers wondered if Mavericks' free deal was more than a jab at rival Microsoft, a move that could actually pose some kind of threat to Windows. They're really very different approaches." "One has made the shift, but for the other, it's not part of the company's DNA. He cited Samsung, Apple's biggest smartphone rival, which he said relies strictly on its hardware to sell, well, the hardware. They're the glue that creates customer loyalty."Ĭompetitors, said Husson, are only now starting to think along similar lines. "Software and services are ways to differentiate. "What differentiates Apple in the space is not necessarily hardware innovation, but the value and benefit to consumers of the entire ecosystem," said Husson. Thomas Husson of Forrester Research also saw the free Mavericks, and Apple's concurrent announcement that it will give its OS X iWork apps to all new Mac buyers, as buttressing the hardware-first strategy. "Apple's saying, 'Why should we hit you up for another $20? The OS is a complement to the device.' For the extra you pay for a Mac, you're getting end-to-end service, including upgrades." "It's an all-included strategy," concurred Ezra Gottheil, an analyst with Technology Business Research. "Mavericks will be a free upgrade because it is about the hardware and getting users engaged with it," Milanesi tweeted during the event. Others joined Milanesi in arguing that a free Mavericks - and future free upgrades, since it would be difficult for Apple to later charge for what had been free of charge - simply showed Cupertino's focus on selling hardware above all else. The company charged $30 for Lion two years later, then in 2012 cut that price by a third to $20 for Mountain Lion. In 2011, Apple slashed the price of Snow Leopard, or OS X 10.6, to $29 earlier upgrades had cost $129. She also pointed out that Apple's move had not come out of left field, but that the firm had been edging toward it for years. "This won't be a huge deal to Apple, but it will be for customers" said Carolina Milanesi of Gartner in a Tuesday interview, referring to the revenue Apple has left on the table by not charging for Mavericks. While Federighi spent time Tuesday at Apple's iPad launch event going over some of the OS's new features, the real news was Apple's zero-dollar price. The no-older-than-Snow-Leopard limitation was due to the App Store, the only distribution channel for Mavericks versions of OS X that preceded Snow Leopard cannot access the e-market. The quartz-wm window manager included with the XQuartz distribution uses the Apple Public Source License Version 2.Mac users running last year's Mountain Lion, 2011's Lion and even 2009's Snow Leopard were able to download Mavericks from the Mac App Store starting yesterday. The X.Org software components’ licenses are discussed on the Please re-install the latest XQuartz X11 release for Leopard after installing a system software update to OS X 10.5.x Leopard.Īn XQuartz installation consists of many individual pieces of software which have various licenses. Because of this, you may experience conflicts after doing a Software Update from Apple. Since the XQuartz X11 package clobbers Apple's X11.app, their software update will clobber the XQuartz X11 package. OS X Software Updates have included some of the work done by the XQuartz project, but for various reasons, Apple cannot ship the latest and greatest version offered by the XQuartz site. Together with supporting libraries and applications, it forms the X11.app that Apple shipped with OS X versions 10.5 through 10.7. The XQuartz project is an open-source effort to develop a version of the X.Org X Window System that runs on macOS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |